Tomblin cited constitutional concerns when he vetoed the bill. The legislation defies the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which protects a woman’s right to have an abortion up until the point that the fetus would be viable outside the womb approximately 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy..
I have a FB account which I use often but the whole privacy issue is a huge thorn that I wrestle with often. FB can control what we can and cannot post, who can and cannot see what we post regardless of what privacy controls we have chosen. But we have also chosen to do business with a private company who can make these decisions.
Huddling with the GOP at the Capitol on Tuesday evening, Trump stopped short of giving a full throated endorsement to legislation meant to unite the moderate and conservative wings of the House Republican caucus.Instead, Trump told Republicans in the closed door strategy session that he would support either of the bills slated for votes later this week.”He didn’t really tell us what bill to vote for,” said Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R Okla.), saying Trump laid out his main principles on immigration and told Republicans he”wanted to take care of the kids” a reference to the unfolding family separation crisis.The impetuous president also often veered off into other unrelated matters during the meeting with House Republicans, as he mused on trade and North Korea policy, people inside the room said. He also mocked Rep.”I want to congratulate Mark on a great race!” Trump said mockingly, according to two people in the room.
“Many of the Republicans at the dinner here tonight expressed surprise that Mr. Reagan had not delivered a longer or more effusive endorsement of his Vice President. In fact, the endorsement consisted of only one paragraph, in which Mr. Miramax ups the ante with a huge ad campaign for its underdog. DAVID J. Appearance.
Essilor was not immediately available for comment.EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager told Reuters this month that the deal would require careful vetting given the size of the two companies market shares. The commission is seeking views from all interested parties.Some retailers fear being undercut by an Essilor Luxottica group able to offer famous brands and prescription lenses at prices they could not hope to match without hurting margins.is a significant development which will result in huge supply chain and retail implications for the industry and consumers worldwide, Specsavers, an international retail partnership, said in a statement emailed to Reuters.Specsavers, which says it has 1,700 stores in 10 countries, and some others in the industry have said they doubt the merger would be felt immediately by consumers.FILE PHOTO The Luxottica name is reflected in a pair of sunglasses in this photo illustration taken in Rome February 4, 2016. REUTERS/Alessandro Bianchi/File PhotoIn the first regulatory ruling on the merger, New Zealand competition regulator approved the deal last week, saying Luxottica Essilor would sufficiently constrained by the presence of existing competitors with the ability to expand at all levels of the supply chain and in all relevant marketsLens makers, too, are watching developments closely, given that Essilor will have access to Luxottica retail chains spanning the Americas, Europe and the Asia Pacific.Essilor, in its half year earnings briefing in July, referred to challenging market reaction to the merger.